Relationship between the gross motor function classification system and hip and lumbar spine development in children with spastic cerebral palsy / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the relationship among the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS)and the development of hip joint and lumbar spine in children with spastic cerebral palsy.@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 125 children with spastic cerebral palsy admitted from January 2018 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 85 males and 40 females, aged from 4 to 12 years old with an average of (8.4±2.9) years. According to GMFCS, the patients were divided into gradeⅠ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ groups. There were 27 cases in gradeⅠgroup, 40 cases in gradeⅡgroup, 35 cases in grade Ⅲ group and 23 cases in grade Ⅳ group. The migration percentage(MP), central edge angle(CE), neck-shaft angle(NSA), acetabular index(AI) were measured by the radiograph of pelvis, abnormal parameters were selected to evaluate the relationship between different GMFCS grades and hip joint development. Lumbar sagittal Cobb angle, lumbar sacral angle, lumbar lordosis index and apical distance were measured by lateral lumbar radiographs to evaluate the relationship between different GMFCS grades and lumbar spine development.@*RESULTS@#①Among the 125 spastic cerebral palsy children, there were 119 cases of pelvic radiographs that met the measurement standards. In the four groups with gradeⅠ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, MP was (22.72±3.88), (26.53±4.36), (33.84±4.99), and (49.54±7.87)%, CE was(30.10±6.99) °, ( 22.92±4.19) °, ( 17.91±5.50) °, and (-0.70±17.33)°, AI was (16.41±2.77) °, (20.46±4.63) °, (23.76±5.10) °, and ( 29.15±7.35)°, respectively, there were significant differences between the two comparisons (P<0.05). And the higher GMFCS grade, the greater MP and AI, and the smaller CE.The NSA was(142.74±10.03) °, (148.66±9.09) °, (151.66±10.52) °, and (153.70±8.05)° in four groups with gradeⅠ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, respectively. The differences between the two comparisons of the GMFCS gradeⅠgroup and the other three groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). NSA of GMFCSⅠgroup was significantly lower than that of the others, there was no significant difference among other groups(P>0.05). ② Among the 125 spastic cerebral palsy children, there were 88 cases of lumbar spine radiographs that met the measurement standards. ③The lumbar sagittal Cobb angle was(32.62±11.10) °, (29.86±9.90) °, (31.70±11.84) °, and (39.69±6.80)° in the four groups with gradeⅠ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, respectively;GMFSS of grade Ⅳ group was significantly higher than that of other three groups, there was significant difference between the two comparisons (P<0.05);there were no significant differences between other groups (P>0.05). In the four groups with gradeⅠ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, the lumbosacral angle was (31.02±9.91) °, ( 26.57±9.41) °, (28.08±8.56) °, and ( 27.31±11.50)°, the lumbar lordosis index was (4.14±12.89), (8.83±13.53), (13.00±11.78), and (10.76±9.97) mm, the arch apex distance was (9.50±6.80), (6.68±3.20), (7.16±4.94), and (6.62±4.13) mm, respectively, there were no significant differences between the two comparisons(P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#①In children with GMFCS gradeⅠ-Ⅳ, the higher the GMFCS grade, the worse the hip develops. ② Children with GMFCS grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ may be at greater risk for lumbar kyphosis.

Inter-Rater And Intra-Rater Reliabiliy Of Postural Analysis Software (MATLAB 7.11 R2010b)

Introduction: Posture analysis software Matlab 7.11 R2010b is commonly used as a tool for postural assessment. It is easy to use. Nonetheless, reliability studies are lacking. Methods: The study sample consisted of 25 pictures from 25 subjects, and each subject was assessed (1 day interval) by 3 blinded raters and by 1 blind rater for 3 times. Photographs of subject were coded and two variables (Lumbar lordosis and Pelvic tilt) were analyzed. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were calculated using intra-class correlation coefficient. Results: The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. We found excellent inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability of Posture analysis software Matlab7.11 R2010b for both variables. Discussion: Observation posture analysis is easy but it is less reliable method. It cannot be used to measure progression of posture corrections and for research purpose. Photography method is most reliable method to evaluate posture. There are many softwares available for analysis of posture and Matlab 7.11 R2010b is one of them. In this study we found excellent inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability of the software. Conclusion: The postural assessment software Matlab 7.11 R2010b is having excellent inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability and should be considered as a reliable tool for postural assessment.

Valoración de la lordosis lumbar y diámetro foraminal utilizando el Soporte de Cirugía Espinal / Evaluation of lumbar lordosis and foraminal diameter using a Spinal Surgery Table

Introducción Tenemos como objetivo, cuantificar los cambios de la lordosis fisiológica en las distintas posiciones, de pie y en decúbito ventral, sobre el Soporte de Cirugía Espinal (SCE) y evaluar indirectamente los cambios de diámetro de los distintos forámenes, midiendo la distancia interpedicular. Materiales y métodos 20 pacientes de 20 a 40 años. Se tomaron radiografías, en posición de pie y sobre el SCE. Se midió la lordosis lumbar en radiografías de pié, y sobre el SCE en dos posiciones (baja/alta) así como la distancia interpedicular de los forámenes de cada segmento. Resultados Se constata una pérdida de la lordosis en la primera posición de 21,65° (37,00%) y en la segunda posición de 28,75° (49,14%). Encontramos un aumento de la distancia interpedicular en todos los niveles tanto en la posición baja como alta del SCE. Los forámenes que presentaron mayor apertura fueron los segmentos de L4-L5, seguidos por L5-S1. Conclusiones Se encontró una pérdida promedio de la lordosis fisiológica del 37,00% y del 49,14% con la utilización del SCE en las dos posiciones utilizadas. En todos los casos existió un aumento de la distancia interpedicular, que vario entre un 10 y un 15%. Los forámenes que mayor apertura presentaron en las distintas posiciones fueron los segmentos L4-L5 seguido por L5-S1. La cifotización de los segmentos móviles permitirían una mejor liberación sacorradicular al aumentar el diámetro del canal y los forámenes. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Background The aim of this study is to quantify the changes of the physiological lordosis in the different positions, standing and in ventral decubitus, on a Spinal Surgery Table (SST), and indirectly evaluate the changes in diameter of the different foramina, and measuring the interpedicular distance. Methods The study included 20 patients from 20 to 40 years old. X-rays were taken in standing position and on the SST. Lumbar lordosis was measured using the X-rays in the standing position, and on the SST in two positions (low/high), as well as the interpedicular distance of the foramina of each segment. Results A loss of lordosis was found in the first position of 22.65° (37.00%) and in the second position of 28.75° (49.14%). An increase was found in the interpedicular distance at all levels in both the low and high position of the SST. The foramina with the greatest opening were the L4-L5 segments, followed by L5-S1. Discussion A mean loss of 37.00% and 49.14%, respectively, was found in the physiological lordosis with the use the SST in the two positions used. In all cases there was an increase in the interpedicular distance, which varied between 10% and 15%. The foramina with the greatest openness in the different positions were segments L4-L5 followed by L5-S1. The kyphotisation of the mobile segments would allow a better sacrum-radicular release when increasing the diameter of the channel and the foramina. Evidence Level: IV

The Effect Of Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise [BLR] Versus Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization [M2T] In Subjects With Hamstring Tightness In Non - Specific Low Backache: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Nonspecific low backache is a pain, muscle tension, or stiffness localized between the costal margin and inferior gluteal folds, without sciatica. Only 10% of the cases have a specific cause. One of the risk factors is poor hamstring flexibility. Mulligan’s BLR and IASTM have shown to improve hamstring flexibility. No studies have compared both. Therefore the study was undertaken. Methods: 48 subjects, mean age 34.27 ± 5.30 were recruited. Group A (24 - 15 male and 9 female) received TENS, Mulligan’s BLR and conventional exercises. Group B (24 - 12 male and 12 female) received TENS, M2T for Hamstrings and conventional exercises. Outcome measures were taken pre-treatment session 1 and post-treatment session 6. Results: Pre and post mean the difference in group A [BLR] was 5.96 ± 0.95 for NPRS, 19.38 ±7.28 for Right AKET, 20.54 ± 6.78 for Left AKET, 2.07 ± 6.49 for Lumbar lordosis and 28.38 ± 9.73 for QBPDS. Pre and post mean the difference in group B [M2T] was 5.71 ± 1.20 for NPRS, 17.00 ± 6.94 for Right AKET, 15.75 ± 6.50 for Left AKET, 1.20 ± 4.76 for Lumbar lordosis and 26.42 ± 11.38 for QBPDS. The intragroup comparison was statistically significant, p = 0.0001 for all outcome measures. Intergroup comparison was statistically significant, p < 0.05 for Left AKET (p=0.0161). Conclusion: Interventions given were equally effective in reducing pain, improving hamstring flexibility, and reducing disability within the group but not between the groups except left AKET.

Observations on Sagittal Alignment of Lumbo-Sacral Spine in Asymptomatic Adults in Kashmir

Introduction: Sacropelvic parameters in various spine and hipdisorders have been published in various studies. We aimed tostudy the normal sacropelvic parameters and curvatures of thespine and their correlation in asymptomatic Indian adults inrelation to variations in sex and age.Material and Methods: 200 Volunteers were taken fromgeneral population with age ranging from 18-50. Patientwas made to stand and left lateral radiograph exposing C7 toS1 and both the hips with a long 30x90 cm cassette placedat 230 cm from the X-ray tube was performed by a singleradiographer to avoid bias.Results: The average LL, SS, PI, PT, and SVA values wereaverage 55.61±10.68, 38.38±8.33,47.94±10.24,10.16±6.23 and 17.27±9.72 respectively. No statistically significantdifference was observed in statistical values with regardsto sex. Our study showed that PI has significant positivecorrelations with SS, LL and PT, and also affects LL. SS hassignificant positive correlation with LL.Conclusion: The current results could contribute to not onlythe understanding of normal sagittal spinal alignment, but alsoserve as a basis for realignment strategies in young Kashmiriadults.

Changes in Sagittal Alignment Following Short-Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison between Posterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.PURPOSE: We aimed to compare radiologic outcomes between posterior (PLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in short-level spinal fusion surgeries.OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although LLIF enables surgeons to insert large lordotic cages, it is unknown whether LLIF more effectively corrects local and global sagittal alignments compared with PLIF in short-level spinal fusion surgeries.METHODS: Radiographic data acquired from patients with lumbar interbody fusion (≤3 levels) using PLIF or LLIF for degenerative lumbar diseases were analyzed. The following radiographic parameters were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively: segmental lordotic angle, disk height, lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), C7 sagittal vertical axis, and thoracic kyphosis (TK).RESULTS: In total, 144 patients with PLIF (193 fused levels) and 101 with LLIF (159 fused levels) were included. Patients’ backgrounds and preoperative radiographic parameters for any level of fusion did not differ significantly between PLIF and LLIF procedures. The LLIF group exhibited significantly greater changes at 1-level fusion compared to the PLIF group in the parameters of segmental lordotic angle (5.1°±5.8° vs. 2.1°±5.0°, p<0.001), disk height (4.2±2.3 mm vs. 2.2±2.0 mm, p<0.001), LL (7.8°±7.6° vs. 3.9°±8.6°, p=0.004), and PI–LL (−6.9°±6.8° vs. −3.6°±10.1°, p=0.03). While, a similar trend was observed regarding 2-level fusion, significantly greater changes were only observed in LL (12.1°±11.1° vs. 4.2°±9.1°, p=0.047) and PI–LL (−11.2°±11.3° vs. −3.0°±9.3°, p=0.043), PT (−6.4°±4.9° vs. −2.5°±5.3°, p=0.049) and TK (7.8°±11.8° vs. −0.3°±9.7°, p=0.047) in the LLIF group at 3-level fusion.CONCLUSIONS: LLIF provides significantly better local sagittal alignment than PLIF in 1- or 2-level fusion cases and improves spinopelvic alignment and local alignment for 3-level fusion cases. Thus, LLIF was demonstrated to be a useful lumbar interbody fusion technique, constituting a powerful tool for achieving sagittal realignment with minimal surgical invasiveness.

Long-term effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion of retaining posterior ligamentous complex / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To compare the long-term effectiveness of wheather posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) preserved between posterior fenestration decompression interbody fusion and posterior total laminectomy interbody fusion. Methods: The clinical data of 89 patients who suffered from single segmental degenerative diseases of lower lumbar spine and followed up more than 10 years after receiving lumbar spinal fusion between January 2000 and January 2005 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the different surgical methods, the 33 patients in group A were treated with posterior lumbar fenestration decompression, interbody fusion, and internal fixation, while 56 patients in group B were treated with posterior total laminectomy resection decompression, interbody fusion, and internal fixation. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, type of lesion, disease duration, lesion segment, and preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Cobb angle of lumbar lordosis between the two groups ( P>0.05). The effectiveness was evaluated by JOA score, and the improvement of pain was evaluated by VAS score. The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) at last follow-up was recorded. Results: Both groups were followed up 10-17 years (mean, 12.6 years). There were 3 cases (9.1%) in group A and 5 cases (8.9%) in group B complicated with cerebrospinal fluid leakage, showing no significant difference ( χ2=0.001, P=0.979). There was no complication such as infection, nerve root injury, internal plant loosening or transposition in both groups. Intervertebral fusion was satisfactory in both groups. The fusion time in groups A and B was (3.4±1.2) months and (3.7±1.6) months respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups ( t=0.420, P=0.676). At last follow-up, the JOA score and VAS score of the two groups were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in Cobb angle of lumbar lordosis before and after operation in group A ( t=0.293, P=0.772), but the Cobb angle of lumbar lordosis in group B was significantly lost at last follow-up ( t=14.920, P=0.000). At last follow-up, the VAS score and Cobb angle of lumbar lordosis in group A were significantly superior to those in group B ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in JOA score between the two groups ( t=0.217, P=0.828). There were 3 cases (9.1%) in group A and 21 cases (37.5%) in group B complicated with ASD, showing significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=8.509, P=0.004). Conclusion: Long-term effectiveness of both groups was satisfactory, but in terms of maintaining lumbar lordosis and reducing the incidence of ASD, the lumbar fusion retaining PLC is superior to total laminectomy and lumbar fusion removing PLC.

Prevention of Adjacent Segmental Disease after Fusion in Degenerative Spinal Disorder: Correlation between Segmental Lumbar Lordosis Ratio and Pelvic Incidence–Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch for a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: Associations among risk factors related to adjacent segmental disease (ASD) remain unclear. We evaluated the risk factors and segmental lordosis ratio to prevent ASD developing after lumbar spinal fusion. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Risk factors related to ASD development are age, sex, obesity, pre-existing degeneration, number of fusion segments, and decreased postoperative lumbar lordosis (LL). However, the associations among these factors are still unclear and should be clearly identified. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on 274 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion of three segments or below for lumbar degenerative disease from January 2010 to December 2012, with over 5 years of follow-up. Patients with preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) >5 cm were excluded due to sagittal imbalance. A total of 37 patients with ASD and 40 control patients (CTRL) were randomly selected in a similar distribution of matching variables: age, sex, and preoperative degenerative changes. Sex, age, number of fusion segments, radiologic measurements, L4–5–S1/L1–S1 LL ratio, and spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence [PI], pelvic tilt [PT], sacral slope [SS], and SVA) were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between PI–LL mismatch and L4–5–S1 segmental lordosis rate. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between ASDs and CTRL groups regarding age, sex, number of fusion segments, fusion method, and preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters (PI, SS, PT, and LL). However, regarding the L4–5–S1/L1–S1 lordosis ratio, 50% (p=0.045), 60% (p=0.031), 70% (p=0.042), 80% (p=0.023), and 90% (p=0.023) were statistically significant; 10 group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a postoperative L4–5–S1/L1–S1 lordosis ratio >50% had less occurrence of ASD. Correcting LL according to PI and physiologic segmental lordosis ratio is important in preventing ASD.

Evaluation of the discal height gain and lumbar lordosis variation obtained by the techniques of transforaminal and posterior lumbar intersomatic fusion / Avaliação do ganho de altura discal e lordose lombar obtido pelas técnicas de fusão intersomática transforaminal e posterior

ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the discal height and lumbar lordosis gains, comparatively, according to the two lumbar arthrodesis techniques, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), used in the treatment of spinal degenerative diseases. Methods: The present study, retrospective, was done with 60 patients who underwent decompression and 1 level lumbar arthrodesis in the Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (HSCMV), between January 2010 and December 2015. The patients were divided in two groups of 30 each, according to the utilized intersomatic arthrodesis technique: TLIF or PLIF. All patients presented pathologies at the L4-L5 level. In this study, the discal height gain and lumbar lordosis variation were evaluated by analyzing spinal radiographies of the pre and post-operatory periods from patients of the two groups, measured by the software Surgimap®. In addition, the pain intensity in the post-operatory period was estimated by the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain). Results: Both techniques presented a gain in the discal height in the post-operatory. There was no statistically significant difference between the discal height variation obtained with the PLIF technique when compared to the TLIF technique (p = 0.139). In the same way, there was no statistically significant difference in the lumbar lordosis variation between the two studied groups (p = 0.184). By the EVA Pain analysis, there was no significant difference in the pain intensity in the post-operatory period between both arthrodesis surgeries. Conclusion: There is no difference in the discal height gain and lumbar lordosis variation, as well as in the pain intensity in the post-operatory periods, in patients who underwent 1 level intersomatic arthrodesis when comparing the PLIF and TLIF techniques.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o ganho de altura discal e lordose lombar, comparativamente, conforme as duas técnicas de artrodese lombar, fusão intervertebral lombar transforaminal (TLIF) e fusão intervertebral lombar posterior (PLIF), usadas para o tratamento de doenças degenerativas da coluna vertebral. Métodos: O presente estudo, retrospectivo, foi feito com 60 pacientes submetidos a descompressão e artrodese lombar de um nível em nossa instituição de janeiro de 2010 a dezembro de 2015. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos de 30 cada, conforme a técnica de artrodese intersomática TLIF ou PLIF. Todos apresentavam patologias no nível de L4-L5. Neste estudo, avaliaram-se o ganho de altura discal e a variação na lordose lombar por meio da análise das radiografias de coluna vertebral do período pré e pós-operatório dos pacientes dos dois grupos, mensurados por meio do programa de computador Surgimap®. Além disso, estimou-se a intensidade de dor no período pós-operatório por meio da Escala Visual Analógica (EVA). Resultados: Ambas as técnicas apresentaram ganho de altura discal no pós-operatório. Não existiu diferença estatisticamente significativa entre a variação da altura discal obtida com a técnica PLIF quando comparada com técnica TLIF (p = 0,139). Da mesma forma, não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre a variação de lordose lombar observada entre os dois grupos (p = 0,184). Por meio da análise da EVA, não houve diferença significativa na dor no período pós-operatório entre ambas as cirurgias de artrodese. Conclusão: Não houve diferença no ganho de altura discal e lordose lombar, assim como na intensidade de dor no período pós-operatório, em pacientes submetidos a artrodese intersomática de um nível quando comparadas as técnicas PLIF e TLIF.

Effect of aging and lumbar spondylosis on lumbar lordosis

Background: Lumbar lordosis (LL), the anterior convexity of the lumbar spine in the mid-sagittal plane, gives the spine some resilience and helps in protecting it from compressive forces because some of the force is taken by the anterior longitudinal ligaments. In aging and lumbar spondylosis, the intervertebral discs undergo the same degenerative changes though at different rates, and in both, while some authors reported a straightening of LL, others reported no significant change. This morphologic information would hopefully influence therapeutic decision-making, particularly in lumbar spondylosis, which though usually asymptomatic, is a common cause of low back pain. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of aging and lumbar spondylosis on LL. Subjects and Methods: Lumbosacral joint angle (LSJA), an angular measure of LL, was retrospectively measured in 252 normal and 329 spondylotic adolescent and adult supine lateral lumbosacral spine archival radiographs, and data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 (New York, USA). Results: Normal LSJA range was 5°–39°; the mean was 18.7° and showed insignificant variation with gender and aging. Spondylotic range was 5°–40° and the mean (20.8°) differed from the normal mean by about 2°, which probably have inconsequential effect on the lumbar curvature, suggesting that the normal and spondylotic mean values are essentially equal. The spondylotic mean also showed insignificant variation with aging and inconsequential 1° gender difference in favor of females. Conclusion: LL is substantially maintained in aging and lumbar spondylosis.

Spinopelvic Orientation on Radiographs in Various Body Postures: Upright Standing, Chair Sitting, Japanese Style Kneel Sitting, and Korean Style Cross-Legged Sitting

BACKGROUND: Several previous studies reported on the impact of upright standing and chair sitting on the sagittal spinopelvic alignment. However, there are no studies on the impact of the two Asian (Korean and Japanese) style floor-sitting positions on the sagittal spinopelvic alignment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of four different body postures (standing, chair sitting, kneel sitting, and cross-legged sitting) on the sagittal spinopelvic alignment. METHODS: Sixteen selected healthy volunteers (10 males and six females) were subjects of this pilot study. In all subjects, radiographs were taken in comfortable standing and sitting positions. All spinal curvatures including lumbar lordotic angle (LLA), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI) were measured on the radiographs. RESULTS: In standing position, the average LLA, SS, PT, and PI were 37.1°, 35.3°, 15.7°, and 51.0°, respectively. In chair sitting, the average LLA, SS, PT, and PI were 17.9°, 20.3°, 28.2°, and 49.5°, respectively. In kneel sitting (Japanese style), the average LLA, SS, PT, and PI were 31.8°, 38.3°, 14.2°, and 52.5°, respectively. In cross-legged sitting (Korean style), the average LLA, SS, PT, and PI were 9.8°, 13.4°, 38.3°, and 51.7°, respectively. LLA in standing (37.1°) and kneel sitting (31.8°) were very similar. Remarkable reduction in LLA was observed in Korean-style cross-legged sitting (9.8°), and LLA in chair sitting (17.9°) was about half of that in standing. SS was similar in standing (35.3°) and kneel sitting (38.3°), and it was reduced remarkably in cross-legged sitting (13.4°). PT was largest in cross-legged sitting (38.3°), and it was similar between standing (15.7°) and kneel sitting (14.2°). PIs were similar in all positions. CONCLUSIONS: The kneel sitting position did not show significant differences with the standing position when assessed using four parameters related to the sagittal spinopelvic alignment, whereas chair sitting and cross-legged sitting positions significantly altered the spinopelvic alignment compared to the standing position.

Effects of different pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis / 中华外科杂志

Objective@#To evaluate the influence of PI-LL (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch) on scoliosis correction, living quality and internal fixation related complications for adult degenerative scoliosis (ASD) after long posterior instrumentation and fusion.@*Methods@#A total of 79 patients with ADS underwent long posterior instrumentation and fusion in the Department of Orthopedics at Beijing Chao Yang Hospital from January 2010 to January 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.There were 21 males and 58 females aging from 55 to 72 years with the mean age (63.4±4.8)years. The patients were divided into three groups according to immediately postoperative PI-LL: PI-LL<10°, 10°≤PI-LL≤20°, PI-LL>20°.Compare the Cobb′s angles, PI-LL, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI). Measurement data were compared via t test and ANOVA, enumeration data were compared via Kruskal-Wallis test, noncontiguous data was performed by χ2 test. Univariate linear regression equation was performed to investigate the relative influences of postoperative PI-LL on postoperative radiographic parameters and clinical outcome.@*Results@#All the operations were successful without intraoperative complications. The operation time was 145-310 minutes (235.3±42.0) minutes, the intraoperative blood loss was 300-5 300 ml (1 021±787) ml, the duration of hospital was 12-18 d (14.5±1.3) d. A total of 4 to 10 (7.0±1.1) vertebra levels were fused. Compared to preoperative, the Cobb′s angle of scoliosis ((4.2±1.8)° vs. (20.1±2.7)°), PI-LL ((16.1±8.6)° vs. (36.0±4.3)°), JOA (3.0±1.3 vs. 5.5±1.2), ODI (24.4±8.1 vs. 62.9±2.7), VAS (3.0±1.0 vs. 6.8±1.3) were significantly decreased postoperative (t=18.539~53.826, P<0.01). Compared to preoperative, postoperative Cobb′s angle of scoliosis ((4.1±2.7)° vs. (19.5±2.7)°, (4.0±1.4)° vs. (20.2±2.4)°, (4.7±0.9)° vs. (20.6±3.0)°) (t=21.148-45.355, P<0.01) and PI-LL ((5.2±2.8)° vs. (35.8±4.9)°, (17.9±2.9)° vs. (37.2±3.9)°, (25.8±2.7)° vs. (34.5±4.0)°) (t=7.227-38.250, P<0.01) were significantly reduced postoperative in PI-LL<10° group, 10°≤PI-LL≤20° group and PI-LL>20° group. Compared to preoperative, ODI (27.7±4.9 vs. 63.3±2.6, 17.7±5.9 vs. 63.1±2.8, 30.6±6.5 vs. 62.3±2.5) (t=21.218~50.858, P<0.01), JOA (2.8±1.2 vs. 5.2±1.2, 3.3±1.1 vs. 5.7±1.1, 2.8±1.7 vs. 5.7±1.2) (t=9.042-16.025, P<0.01) and VAS (2.9±1.2 vs.7.0±1.3, 3.3±0.9 vs.7.0±1.4, 2.9±0.8 vs. 6.3±1.2) (t=16.073-22.214, P<0.01) were all significantly reduced at last follow-up. There were statistic differences in ODI and LSDI (F=38.477, P<0.01; F=37.063, P<0.01) at the last follow-up among the three groups. There was a negative correlation in PI-LL and LSDI according to linear regression (B=-5.838, P<0.01) in the last follow-up. All the patients were followed up, the follow-up duration were 2 to 5 years with the mean (3.1±0.7) years. The internal fixation failure related complications in 3 years included proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in 19 cases, internal fixation loosening in 6 cases. Eight patients received reoperation for severe local pain and low extremity symptoms. PJK occurrences were significantly different among PI-LL<10° group, 10°≤PI-LL≤20° group and PI-LL>20° group.@*Conclusions@#The PI-LL between 10° and 20° may be the best choice in ADS patients after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for its better clinical outcome and less proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). The overcorrection of LL may lead to more serious postoperative lumbar stiffness.

Cambios en la lordosis lumbar luego de una artrodesis vertebral posterior de la columna torácica y su relación con la incidencia pelviana / Changes in lumbar lordosis after further spinal fusion of thoracic spine and its relationship to pelvic incidence

Objetivo: Evaluar las variables del plano sagital en pacientes con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente tratados mediante una artrodesis vertebral posterior instrumentada con tornillos pediculares y establecer relaciones entre ellas. Materiales y Métodos: Se evaluó retrospectivamente a 20 pacientes. Se compararon los cambios en la lordosis cervical, la cifosis torácica, la lordosis lumbar, la incidencia pelviana, el balance sagital global y la cifosis de la unión proximal en los espinogramas preoperatorio, posoperatorio inmediato y a los dos años de la cirugía. Se correlacionaron los cambios en la lordosis lumbar con la cifosis torácica y la incidencia pelviana. Resultados: Se observó una disminución significativa en la cifosis torácica y en la lordosis lumbar en el espinograma posoperatorio inmediato. Ambos parámetros mostraron un aumento en el espinograma a los dos años. Se halló un aumento significativo en la cifosis de la unión proximal y en la lordosis cervical entre el preoperatorio y el posoperatorio a los dos años. La única correlación posoperatoria significativa fue entre la lordosis lumbar y la incidencia pelviana en el espinograma a los dos años de la cirugía. Conclusiones: La artrodesis vertebral posterior instrumentada con tornillos pediculares en curvas Lenke 1 provoca una reducción posoperatoria de la cifosis torácica y de la lordosis lumbar, y un aumento posoperatorio de la lordosis cervical y de la cifosis de la unión proximal. A los dos años, se observó un aumento de la lordosis lumbar no instrumentada, y que dicha lordosis lumbar se correlaciona significativamente con la incidencia pelviana.

Objective: To evaluate the sagittal profile variables in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent selective thoracic posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion with pedicle screws and to determine relationships among them. Methods: Twenty consecutive patients were retrospectively evaluated. Changes in cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, proximal junctional kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence and global sagittal balance were compared in standing lateral radiographs performed before surgery, at the immediate postoperative period, and two years after surgery. Changes in postoperative lumbar lordosis were correlated with changes in thoracic kyphosis and pelvic incidence. Results: There was a significant decrease in thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis between preoperative and immediate postoperative radiographs, but both parameters showed an increase in the radiographs two years later. A significant increase in proximal junctional kyphosis and cervical lordosis was also found between preoperative and 2-year postoperative radiographs. The only significant postoperative correlation found was between lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence at 2-year follow-up control. Conclusions: Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion with pedicle screws in Lenke type 1 deformities reduces thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, and increases cervical lordosis and proximal junctional kyphosis. Uninstrumented lumbar lordosis increased at 2-year follow-up and it is strongly related to the pelvic incidence.

Mini-Open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PURPOSE: To introduce the techniques and present the surgical outcomes of mini-open anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at the most caudal segments of the spine combined with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) for the correction of adult spinal deformity OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although LLIF is increasingly used to correct adult spinal deformity, the correction of sagittal plane deformity with LLIF alone is reportedly suboptimal. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity underwent LLIF combined with mini-open ALIF at the L5–S1 or L4–S1 levels followed by 2-stage posterior fixation. ALIF was performed for a mean 1.3 levels and LLIF for a mean 2.7 levels. Then, percutaneous fixation was performed in 11 patients (percutaneous group), open correction with facetectomy with or without laminectomy in 16 (open group), and additional pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in 5 (PSO group). Spinopelvic parameters were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Hospitalization data and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: No major medical complications developed, and clinical outcomes improved postoperatively in all groups. The mean postoperative segmental lordosis was greater after ALIF (17.5°±5.5°) than after LLIF (8.1°±5.3°, p <0.001). Four patients (12.5%) had lumbar lordosis with a pelvic incidence of ±9° preoperatively, whereas this outcome was achieved postoperatively in 30 patients (93.8%). The total increase in lumbar lordosis was 14.7° in the percutaneous group, 35.3° in the open group, and 57.0° in the PSO group. The ranges of potential lumbar lordosis increase were estimated as 4°–25°, 23°–42°, and 45°–65°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-open ALIF combined with LLIF followed by posterior fixation may be a feasible technique for achieving optimal sagittal balance and reducing the necessity of more extensive surgery.

Assessment of Lumbar Lordosis and Lumbar Core Strength in Information Technology Professionals

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. PURPOSE: To correlate lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength in information technology (IT) professionals. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: IT professionals have to work for long hours in a sitting position, which can affect lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength. METHODS: Flexicurve was used to assess the lumbar lordosis, and pressure biofeedback was used to assess the lumbar core strength in the IT professionals. All subjects, both male and female, with and without complaint of low back pain and working for two or more years were included, and subjects with a history of spinal surgery or spinal deformity were excluded from the study. Analysis was done using Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: For the IT workers, no correlation was seen between lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength (r=-0.04); however, a weak negative correlation was seen in IT people who complained of pain (r=-0.12), while there was no correlation of lumbar lordosis and lumbar core in IT people who had no complains of pain (r=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that there is no correlation of lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength in IT professionals, but a weak negative correlation was seen in IT people who complained of pain.

Assessment of Lumbar Lordosis and Lumbar Core Strength in Information Technology Professionals

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. PURPOSE: To correlate lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength in information technology (IT) professionals. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: IT professionals have to work for long hours in a sitting position, which can affect lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength. METHODS: Flexicurve was used to assess the lumbar lordosis, and pressure biofeedback was used to assess the lumbar core strength in the IT professionals. All subjects, both male and female, with and without complaint of low back pain and working for two or more years were included, and subjects with a history of spinal surgery or spinal deformity were excluded from the study. Analysis was done using Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: For the IT workers, no correlation was seen between lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength (r=-0.04); however, a weak negative correlation was seen in IT people who complained of pain (r=-0.12), while there was no correlation of lumbar lordosis and lumbar core in IT people who had no complains of pain (r=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that there is no correlation of lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength in IT professionals, but a weak negative correlation was seen in IT people who complained of pain.

Decreased Lumbar Lordosis and Deficient Acetabular Coverage Are Risk Factors for Subchondral Insufficiency Fracture

Subchondral insufficiency fracture (SIF) of the femoral head occurs in the elderly and recipients of organ transplantation. Osteoporosis and deficient lateral coverage of the acetabulum are known risk factors for SIF. There has been no study about relation between spinopelvic alignment and anterior acetabular coverage with SIF. We therefore asked whether a decrease of lumbar lordosis and a deficiency in the anterior acetabular coverage are risk factors. We investigated 37 patients with SIF. There were 33 women and 4 men, and their mean age was 71.5 years (59-85 years). These 37 patients were matched with 37 controls for gender, age, height, weight, body mass index and bone mineral density. We compared the lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, acetabular index, acetabular roof angle, acetabular head index, anterior center-edge angle and lateral center-edge angle. Lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, acetabular index and acetabular head index were significantly different between SIF group and control group. Lumbar lordosis (OR = 1.11), lateral center edge angle (OR = 1.30) and anterior center edge angle (OR = 1.27) had significant associations in multivariate analysis. Decreased lumbar lordosis and deficient anterior coverage of the acetabulum are risk factors for SIF as well as decreased lateral coverage of the acetabulum.

Clinical Implications of Spino-pelvic Parameters for the Outcome of Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

STUDY DESIGN: A review of the literature. OBJECTIVES: To discuss how to evaluate, interpret, and utilize measurements of spino-pelvic alignment before and after spinal surgery in patients with lumbar degenerative disease. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Various spino-pelvic parameters are currently utilized in the evaluation of spinal patients; however, interpretation of these parameters is not easy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each spino-pelvic parameter and factors affecting its value, and how to interpret and utilize the spino-pelvic parameters before and after spinal surgery were discussed for patients with lumbar degenerative disease with and without sagittal spinal deformity. RESULTS: Sagittal modifiers in the SRS-Schwab classification including pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic tilt (PT) are widely accepted in the evaluation of lumbar degenerative disease with sagittal deformity. Surgery for sagittal realignment is meant to restore both the SVA and PT by restoring the LL in reference to the PI. However, patients with an extremely high SVA and PT or those with a high SVA and low PT can end up with postoperative residual malalignment. In patients without deformity, PI-LL mismatch (> 10°) should be highlighted and should be actively corrected by restoring the lordosis of the pathologic segment. CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal modifiers are beneficial for their simplicity and comprehensibility; however, they are insufficient for evaluating sub-regional spinal deformity. Spino-pelvic parameters can be useful for evaluating spinal patients in a clinical setting, but the measurements are greatly affected by confounding factors such as poor patient posture, unqualified testers, and manual measurement techniques.

The Effect of Standing and Different Sitting Positions on Lumbar Lordosis: Radiographic Study of 30 Healthy Volunteers

STUDY DESIGN: Radiographic review of healthy volunteers. PURPOSE: To determine the ideal sitting positions by measuring changes in lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic parameters (PPs) in various positions. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Prolonged sitting is generally accepted as an important risk factor for low back pain (LBP). It is now recognized that spinopelvic alignment is important for maintaining an energy-efficient posture. METHODS: Lateral spine radiographs of thrirty healthy volunteers (male participants) were taken in standing and five sitting positions. Radiographic measurement of LL and PPs was performed in each position. Statistical analysis was performed to identify a correlation between changes in the LL and PPs in each positions. RESULTS: LL in standing was 48.5degrees+/-8.7degrees. Sitting significantly decreased LL and segmental angle when compared with standing (p<0.05). The lower lumbar segmental angles (L4-5 and L5-S1) significantly decreased in all sitting positions (p<0.05), but the decrease was relatively less on the chair with lumbar support and in the 90degrees-angled chair. The sacral slope (SS) decreased and the pelvic tilt increased with decreasing LL in the sitting positions. CONCLUSIONS: Sitting causes a reduction in LL and SS when compared with standing. It might cause a spinopelvic imbalance and result in chronic LBP. Our study showed that sitting on a chair with back support induced minimal changes to LL. Consequently, it is proposed that sitting on a chair with back support would be a much more ideal position than sitting on other types of chairs.

Restoration of Lumbar Lordosis in Flat Back Deformity: Optimal Degree of Correction

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: To provide an ideal correction angle of lumbar lordosis (LL) in degenerative flat back deformity. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The degree of correction in degenerative flat back in relation to pelvic incidence (PI) remains controversial. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with flat back deformity who underwent corrective surgery were enrolled. Posterior-anterior-posterior sequential operation was performed. Mean age and mean follow-up period was 65.6 years and 24.2 months, respectively. We divided the patients into two groups based on immediate postoperative radiographs-optimal correction (OC) group (PI-9degrees or =55degrees). Radiological and clinical results were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients in OC group had significantly less correction loss and maintained normal sagittal alignment (sagittal vertical axis<5 cm), as compared to patients in UC group (p<0.05). LL of low PI group significantly maintained within 9degrees better than high PI group (p<0.05). Oswestry disability index (ODI) significantly decreased at last follow-up, as compared to preoperative state. However, there was no significant difference in last follow-up ODI between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In flat back deformity, correction of LL to within 9degrees of PI will result in better sagittal balance. Thus, we recommend sufficient LL to prevent correction loss, especially in patients with high PI.